Oral Traditions
![]()
Introduction
SO
MANY WRITERS
have been inspired by the oral traditions of the
American West that very few western novels, poems,
and plays are without allusions to Native American
myths, tales, and songs or to western folklore.
Thanks to the pioneers of ethnology and folklore
studies, the West's oral traditions have been
recorded in print, preserved in thousands of
volumes. Many readers are aware of the existence
of such volumes of recorded oral literature,
but few realize how rich that heritage is.
Even after reading books of Indian literature,
many non-Indians remain ignorant of the value of
the Native American oral narratives, because, as
Kenneth M. Roemer explains, "they tend to
associate them with `quaint' or `primitive' fairy
tales, folklore or superstitions. Part of the
explanation for these misconceptions is that the
popular written and mass media forms of transmitting
information about Native American oral narratives
often strip away the cultural and literary contexts
of the stories. Furthermore, the narratives are
usually associated with the dead past of the Vanished
American" ("Native American Oral Narratives:
Context and Continuity," in Smoothing the Ground
[University of California Press, 1983], ed. Brian Swann,
p. 39). In their chapter in this section of A Literary
History of the American West, Larry Evers and Paul
Pavich explain the history of the Native American
oral tradition in general terms, giving the cultural
and literary contexts of that tradition. Evers and
Pavich, pointing out that their subject is too vast
and complex to be exhaustively treated in a single
essay, ask us at least to recognize that our
media-instilled views of Native American literature
are misconceptions.
The mass media may find it increasingly difficult to
continue purveying such misconceptions, since the
study of Native American culture has become an
established part of the curriculum at many major
universities, leading to the publication of
journals such as American Indian Quarterly, Studies
in American Indian Literature, American Indian Culture
and Research Journal, and Sun Tracks: An
American Indian Literary Magazine. Such journals exist
because, as Karl Kroeber writes,"Indian narratives
need sophisticated critical attention." In
Traditional Literatures of the American Indian:
Texts and Interpretations (University of Nebraska
Press, 1981), Kroeber also says that as a teacher he
has found "that many Americans who know only
Western literature are baffled by Indian oral
narratives" (p. 1). He advises an inexperienced reader
Western folklore has also invited analysis, perhaps
because it has occupied such a large territory in
the American mind for more than a century. As
Malcolm Cowley explains: "What we might call
the first American mythology had taken final shape
by 1890. In retrospect it seems amazingly complete,
including as it does a score of familiar backgrounds,
each with its registered trademark." And many of the
trademarks Cowley mentions are western: ". . .
the sod house on the prairie, the chuck wagon surrounded
by cowboys squatting on their heels, the Indian village
with dancing braves, and the gambling saloon near the
California diggings" ("Three Cycles of Myth in
American Writing," in A Many-Windowed House
[Southern Illinois University Press, 1970], p. 235).
"Against those familiar backgrounds," Cowley
continues, "moved a whole pantheon of mythological
figures, at least twelve of which might be listed
as major gods of our first native Olympus." Of the
twelve American gods Cowley identifies, five are
largely or entirely western: the woods ranger; the
backwoods boaster; "the slit-eyed, lean-jawed,
soft spoken gambler with two six-guns hidden beneath
the frock coat made by the best Omaha tailor"; the
outlaw; and the Indian chief. And of the "demigodlike
figures" not far behind those major deities,
many are western.
JAMES H. MAGUIRE,Boise State University
. . . to assume that such tales can be
comprehended, that they are neither below nor beyond
our customary procedures of analyzing and evaluating
literature, and, therefore, that one should attack
head-on any overt critical problems posed by a particular
tale. One should begin by assuming that an Indian oral
narrative may be a first-rate work of art. One must abandon
the misconception that this literature is "primitive."
It is not. It is worth remembering that all good literature
raises troubling problems and is structured by intricacies
which both attract and defeat the most intense analysis.
(pp. 23)

© Texas Christian University Press, 1998. All rights reserved.